Georgia Pest Control Practice Test

Which statement is not true concerning ultra low volume (ULV) application?

1. They are often used to supplement residual applications

2. May be applied alone with no other type of application

3. Cubic footage must be determined

4. The most effective use is for controlling cockroaches

The correct answer is: May be applied alone with no other type of application

When considering the nature of ultra low volume (ULV) application in pest control, it's important to understand its role and effectiveness relative to other application methods. ULV is a technique that delivers a very small volume of pesticide mixed with air, resulting in a fine mist that can cover large areas and penetrate areas where pests may hide. The statement regarding ULV applications being applied alone with no other type of application is not true because while ULV applications can be effective on their own in certain scenarios, they are most commonly used in conjunction with other methods, such as residual applications. This combination maximizes pest control efficacy, as the residual treatments provide longer-lasting effects while ULV effectively targets active populations immediately. The other statements align better with the characteristics of ULV. For example, ULV is indeed often used to supplement residual applications, as this maximizes the chances of effectively controlling pests. Determining cubic footage is also necessary for proper application rates and achieving effective dispersal, ensuring the ULV mist reaches the appropriate areas without over-application. While ULV can target various pests, it is not specifically the most effective method for controlling cockroaches compared to other targeted approaches based on their behavior and hiding spots. Thus, the misrepresentation lies